Friday, April 29, 2011

Top 10 Favourite Cars (2007-2011)

All good things must come to an end.

Whether or not these lists have actually been any good is still up for debate - my drop in readership suggests that perhaps they haven't been.  My hope is that the subject matter itself - and not waning quality - is the actual reason for this, as I understand that slam dunk contests and sports cars aren't exactly everyone's cup of tea.  But I can only write what I know, and since I have a feeling not too many people want to read a weekly column about Tegan and Sara, I have to mix it up every once and a while with the other things that I enjoy.  And cars are certainly near the top of that list.

But, like I said, all good things must come to an end.  And the sun is most certainly setting on this current discussion about cars.  Despite the extra work that these lists took, I very much enjoyed making them, and I'll actually be sad to see them go.  It also means that I need to come up with some fresh subject matter pretty damn soon.  Whether this new topic will be enough to bring the likes of Danica and Katy back to my readership, only time will tell.



2010 Lotus Evora S
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.5 L V6
Horsepower: 345 bhp
Torque: 295 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3047 lbs
Top Speed: 172 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.6 seconds


Ok, it has a Toyota Camry engine.  Go ahead, make fun all you want.  But I love the Evora.  If I was actually in the market for a $75,000 sports cars, I think my search would begin and end with the Lotus.  Sure, it's not as fast as the other cars on this list, and it's certainly not as powerful, but it has four seats, a bit of trunk space and is dead sexy.  If you're actually going to drive a car (more than once a month) then those sound like the sort of features you might actually like to have.  Oh, and that Camry engine that you were so eager to mock?  27 miles per gallon.  The Bugatti Veyron?  6.



2011 Lexus LFA
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 4.8 L V10
Horsepower: 552 bhp
Torque: 354 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3570 lbs
Top Speed: 202 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.6 seconds


Speaking of Toyota engines, they most certainly did not go with the Camry engine when outfitting this one.  The boys in Aichi, Japan were tasked with making a supercar for Toyota's upscale marquee, and it would appear as though they have delivered.  In spades.  But what they also delivered was a pretty hefty price tag, $350,000 to be exact.  And as sexy, and fast and stunningly engineered as the LFA is, at the end of the day, if I was in the market for a supercar in that price range, I doubt very much that I would find myself walking into a Lexus dealership.



2008 Maserati GrandTurismo S
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 4.7 L V8
Horsepower: 440 bhp
Torque: 361 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 4145 lbs
Top Speed: 183 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.8 seconds


It's been pointed out to me that a lot of these lists are dominated by Ferrari.  And I can't argue against that point.  Ferrari is easily my favourite car manufacturer, both currently and historically.  But, seeing that the point is valid - I am perhaps a little biased - maybe I should allow other Italian cars to enjoy a bit of praise as well.  So how's this for turning things around?  Putting one of Ferrari's greatest rivals here most certainly proves that these lists are completely impartial, and purely objective, right?  What's that?  Ferrari took over Maserati in 1997, and saved it from the brink of bankruptcy?  Well, I was hoping you wouldn't notice that.



2011 McLaren MP4-12C
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.8 L V8
Horsepower: 592 bhp
Torque: 443 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2866 lbs
Top Speed: 205 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.3 seconds


The jury is still out on this one.  Sure, it looks great.  Sure, the specs are impressive.  Sure, the McLaren name alone should earn it the benefit of the doubt.  But no one has been able to get their hands on it yet, so it could end up being a major disappointment.  If it's brilliant - which it probably will be - chances are it could be two or three spots higher.  Maybe even right at the number one spot.  Of course, maybe it will end up deserving to be lower.  Basically, what I'm saying is this: if it ends up being one of the greatest cars ever known to man, and you're reading back on these old lists in two years, wondering how I could even claim to like cars, at all, seeing that I have this now-proven-to-be-great car not even in my Top 5, let me assure you: I didn't know.  I swear, I didn't know.



2008 Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4
Layout: Mid Engine, All Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.2 L V10
Horsepower: 553 bhp
Torque: 398 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3307 lbs
Top Speed: 202 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.6 seconds


A funny thing happened to Lamborghini.  After many failed attempts at a smaller, more affordable alternative to their flagship supercars, they finally got it right.  In fact, they might have got it a little too right, because I like the Gallardo a fair bit more than the Murciélago.  And that just shouldn't be the case.  Bigger is better, and this 'baby-lambo' has two less cylinders and almost a hundred less horsepower than it's bigger brother.  Liking this one more than the Murciélago is akin to liking Stallone more than Schwarzenegger.  Or Scottie Pippen more than Michael Jordan.  It just shouldn't be the case.  And yet, here we are.  Maybe I need to re-watch Over The Top, and reconsider my stance on Stallone as well.



2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 6.2 L V8
Horsepower: 563 bhp
Torque: 480 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3800 lbs
Top Speed: 197 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.7 seconds


Ok, the doors are a little gimmicky.  And sure, the rear end is no where near as sexy as the front.  But with the most powerful, naturally aspirated engine in the world, none of that matters.  In fact, in terms of a pure GT car, the SLS might just be the very best on the planet.  Sure, other cars accelerate quicker, are lighter and more nimble, and have higher top speeds.  And those same cars will pace a race track much, much faster.  But the SLS wasn't designed for a race track, just like most drivers weren't either.




2007 Aston Martin DBS
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.9 L V12
Horsepower: 510 bhp
Torque: 420 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3740 lbs
Top Speed: 191 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.3 seconds


The current styling of the Aston Martin stable has been going strong since 2004.  While most cars start showing their age after that much time, the DB9 and DBS continue to rank amoung the sexiest cars in the world.  In fact, it's hard to imagine how they could possibly make it look any better than it already does.  Of course, I said the same thing about the DB7 when they announced the DB9 as it's replacement early last decade, and they certainly proved me wrong.



2008 Lamborghini Reventón
Layout: Mid Engine, All Wheel Drive
Engine: 6.5 L V12
Horsepower: 631 bhp
Torque: 487 ft lbs
Curb Weight: unknown
Top Speed: 221 mph
Zero to Sixty: unknown


I may like the Gallardo more than the Murciélago, but that comparison does not include the Reventón.  Although, technically, it's based upon the Murciélago, it's also based on stealth fighter planes.  And this makes it quite possibly the most stunning Lamborghini ever to roll out of Sant'Agata Bolognese.  Everything about this car makes me drool.  Too bad they only made 20 of them.



2009 Aston Martin One-77
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 7.3 L V12
Horsepower: 750 bhp
Torque: 553 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3307 lbs
Top Speed: 220 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.5 seconds


Speaking of limited production supercars, only 77 of these glorious Aston's will ever see the light of day.  And while it may be a bit too over-the-top, styling-wise, compared to the DB9 or DBS, the performance numbers cannot be ignored.  Aston Martin has made some truely great cars over the years, and this might just be the best of them all.




2010 Ferrari 458 Italia
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 4.5 L V8
Horsepower: 562 bhp
Torque: 398 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3048 lbs
Top Speed: 202 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.3 seconds


Of course I'm going to end off with a Ferrari.  It was inevitable.  But this is not simply a case of me shoehorning an undeserving car into the top spot in order to end with a Prancing Horse.  No, no.  This car absolutely needs to be here.  I mean, just look at it.  It's absolutely breathtaking (and even more-so in person).  And the fun doesn't stop there.  It has been engineered to the very brink of perfection.  I'm not sure if there is anything on this planet that I would rather have... except for maybe a genie, who looks just like Jessica Alba, that can grant me a thousand wishes, and shits hundred dollar bills.  But let's be honest, I would just use those hundred dollar bills to pay for gas, and those thousand wishes for a thousand 458 Italias.



Honourable Mentions:
2010 Porsche 911 Turbo S
2010 Audi R8 GT
2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
2008 Nissan GT-R
2007 Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione

Friday, April 15, 2011

Top 10 Favourite Cars (2000-2006)

Let's get this out of the way right now.  This post is going to be kind of half-assed.  No, it's not because I don't love you guys anymore.  And no, you haven't done anything wrong.  It's not you, it's me.  Actually, it's not even me.  It's stupid Blogger doo-doo head.  You see, I already typed this blog once already.  And I'm not going to lie.  It was good.  So good in fact, that the powers that be conspired to keep it from ever seeing the light of day and enlightening all of man kind.  And, much like the Kennedy assassination, or the UFO landing at Roswell, the documents that tell what really happened are buried so deep, that they will never see the light of day again.

Which sucks.

And, I know what you're saying.  Fight the system.  Don't go quietly into that good night.  You can't let The Man win.  But it's too late, friends.  The wind is out of my sails.  I stand before you a shattered and broken man.  Every ounce of will and perseverance drained from my body, leaving only the husk of a man that you see before you today.  A hollow shell of his former self.

Also, from now on, I'm typing these damned things in MS Word and saving a new copy every two minutes.  That way you don't have to be subjected to posts such as this in the future...

To sum up the gist of the now long-lost-blog-that-never-was, basically, even though I love the sixties, and it will always be my favourite decade of automobile production, in reality, the cars made today are much, much better.  I debated the merits of favourite vs best, why they're not always one-and-the-same, and concluded that although my soft spot will always be for the sixties, the stuff being made today is a very close second.  I also determined that I would not be able to narrow it down to 10 favourite cars, and once again decided to split the decade into two lists (and amended the decade to include 2010 and 2011, thus making my math appear slightly suspect, when in reality, it was completely intentional...)

And after all that, we got on with the list.



2004 Porsche Carrera GT
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.7 L V10
Horsepower: 612 bhp
Torque: 435 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3042 lbs
Top Speed: 205 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.8 seconds


Porsche, for all it's proud history and racing heritage, had never really built a true supercar.  Sure, the GT1 would definitely meet all the criteria to be considered one, but that was really just a race car with signal lights bolted on to meet homologation regulations.  And they only made the very bare minimum 25 cars required for that.  No, I'm talking about something that was absolutely bonkers, but still designed to actually be driven on public roads.  Some of the 911 Turbos, and super-light GT2 and RS cars were close, but none were really crazy enough to merit true consideration.  Which is where the Carrera GT comes in.  Forget the rear engine nonsense, they finally went with the proven mid-engine layout.  They also ditched their usual flat-6 engine for something with a little more grunt.  By the time they finished wrapping some sexy body work around the frame, Porsche was without a supercar no more.



2003 Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.4 L V8
Horsepower: 617 bhp
Torque: 575 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3898 lbs
Top Speed: 208 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.2 seconds


Mercedes has quietly been making some of the most powerful cars on the road.  Within their stable is the E 63 (518 bhp), the S 65 (608 bhp), the CL 65 (621 bhp), the SL 65 Black Series (661 bhp), and the SLS (563 bhp).  All of those numbers are staggering, and yet, Mercedes isn't one of the first names that usually pops into a person's head when a discussion of the most powerful cars in the world comes up.  Which is why they teamed with McLaren (whose only other car at the time was the phenomenal F1) to produce this: a balls-to-the-wall GT car.  Fast, powerful, and with all the luxury that you'd expect from Mercedes.  But this time, with enough flash to get noticed, and at least mentioned alongside the other supercars of it's ilk.



2002 Ferrari Enzo
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 6.0 L V12
Horsepower: 651 bhp
Torque: 485 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3020 lbs
Top Speed: 220 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.2 seconds


Let's get this out of the way, right now.  The Enzo is not a pretty car.  At all.  But it doesn't need to be.  All it needs to do is go very, very fast.  And it certainly does just that.  Of course, it would have to, if it was going to be the company's posthumous tribute to the man whose blood, sweat and tears made the company what it is today.  I mean, you can't just name any old Ferrari an Enzo.  It has to be the best one ever built if it's going to carry the founder's name on it for all time.  And if making it a little uglier results in a little more performance, then who am I to argue?  Besides, it's not like Enzo Ferrari, the man, was particularly good looking either.



2006 Koenigsegg CCX
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 4.7 L V8
Horsepower: 806 bhp
Torque: 678 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2601 lbs
Top Speed: 245 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.2 seconds


Ah the Swedes.  If they can design a cheap bookshelf that I can put together using just the provided Allen key, and only have three pieces left over when I'm done assembling it, why can't they build a supercar as well?  The short answer to that is that they can, and they did.  In fact, for a brief time (6 months) prior to the arrival of the Bugatti Veyron, the CCR held the record of world's fastest production car, which had previously been dominated for over a decade by the McLaren F1.  But even more impressive than that is the unofficial record that the CCX holds for the world's fastest speeding ticket (allegedly 242 mph in a 70 mph zone in May of 2003).  That's the sort of thing worth getting framed and hung on your wall.



2006 Ascari A10
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine:4.9 L V8
Horsepower: 625 bhp
Torque: 413 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2822 lbs
Top Speed: 215 mph
Zero to Sixty: 2.8 seconds


Ascari is fairly new, and largely unheard of in the eyes of the general public.  But their efforts so far have been more than enough to get me to stand up and take notice.  The KZ1 was very good looking, and none-too-shabby in the performance department, and it's successor, the A10, is a legitimate supercar.  Plus, I just know that at least one of my readers will love the fact that it's the brain-child of a Dutch millionaire (even if the engine is from BMW, and the company is based out of England).  Need more convincing?  Look at every car on this list.  Every one of them (yes, even the Veyron*).  This car had a faster lap time on the Top Gear Test Track than all of them.

*Yes, the Super Sport did eventually post a faster lap time, but I prefer the original Veyron to the Super Sport version, and that's the one on this list, and that's the one that was a full second slower around the track in Dunsfold.



2005 Ford GT
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.4 L V8
Horsepower: 550 bhp
Torque: 500 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3485 lbs
Top Speed: 205 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.3 seconds


This car was the centerpiece of my debate about the sixties versus today.  The GT looks very similar to the GT-40 of old, it's more powerful and even more importantly, street legal.  It's undoubtedly more comfortable, and livable, and drivable, and reliable (although Jeremy Clarkson had nothing but problems with his).  So why is the GT-40 one of my favourite cars ever made, and the GT barely made the top five of a list that doesn't even cover an entire decade?  Well, you'll simply have to believe me when I assure you that I made a very good case, and came to a Pulitzer-worthy conclusion that even the most simple of men could understand on the matter.  Unfortunately, that post was lost for all time, and you'll just have to accept this inconclusive re-hash, that leaves those important questions completely unanswered. 




2006 Lamborghini Murciélago LP 640
Layout: Mid Engine, All Wheel Drive
Engine: 6.5 L V12
Horsepower: 631 bhp
Torque: 487 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3638 lbs
Top Speed: 211 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.3 seconds


It's hard to say that the Murcielago is 'toned-down' and keep a straight face - it's still pretty crazy looking - but really, when compared to the Diablo and the Countach, it's practically subtle.  This was the first all-new model created by the company after Audi took over ownership of the struggling company in 1998, and although not quite as in-your-face (in terms of styling) as the company's previous aforementioned flagship cars, this Lamborghini is anything but tame by comparison.



2006 Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 6.0 L V12
Horsepower: 611 bhp
Torque: 448 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3722 lbs
Top Speed: 205 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.4 seconds



Speaking of subtle, it's third on a list of the things that I love most about this Ferrari.  I mean, it doesn't look like a family car or anything, but it's still not aggressive enough in appearance to make you think that it's actually the most powerful and indeed fastest car that Ferrari currently makes.  I know that a 12-year-old Travis would kick me in the shins and shake his head with disgust at the very notion of it, but as I get older, it becomes more and more clear to me: there's something to be said for subtlety.  Oh, and in case you're wondering, the first and second things that I like most about this car are the engine and the engine (in that order).



2006 Pagani Zonda F Roadster
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 7.3 L V12
Horsepower: 650 bhp
Torque: 575 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2822 lbs
Top Speed: 215 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.5 seconds


Pagani gets it.  They really do.  It's not about having the very best performance.  It's not about having the most functionality.  It's about making the 12-year-old boy that lives inside every one of us, wet himself at the very sight of it.  It's about the pure lunacy of it all.  Sure, some cars accelerate faster, and some cars have a higher top speed, and that makes them supercars in their own right.  But the Zonda is the very essence of what a supercar should be.  It's the Webster's definition.  Just look at the interior.  They could have gotten rid of all that stuff, or at least used more practical switches and knobs.  But they didn't.  They understand that the little things matter.  That 60kg of less weight might make it go 2.5% faster, but it also makes it 30% less desirable.  And in a supercar, desirability matters.  Why?  Because most guys that pay over a million dollars for a car will never actually push the car to it's very limits on a race track, but they will be smiling from ear-to-ear and happy to have paid every penny because of it, when they have to flip a switch straight out of a WWII bomber plane just to turn on the hazard lights.




2005 Bugatti Veyron EB 16.4
Layout: Mid Engine, All Wheel Drive
Engine: 8.0L W16
Horsepower: 987 bhp
Torque: 922 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 4162 lbs
Top Speed: 253 mph
Zero to Sixty: 2.5 seconds


Bugatti gets it too.  Just be the very best.  And although it's all very mechanical and precise as compared to the Zonda, which is carefree and full of soul, it's still the greatest achievement in automotive engineering ever.  And that can't be ignored.  Sure, it's a bit too heavy to be considered quick, but nothing is faster.  And more importantly, nothing goes as fast with less drama.  Sure, you can strap a rocket to a pair of roller skates and do 300 mph, but the whole time you'll be flying along, the very bolts seemingly shaking loose beneath you, not wondering if you might die - no, that's a foregone conclusion - but rather when you will die, and in what manner.  And supposedly a lot of cars are like that too.  Sure, plenty have been made that are capable of breaking the illustrious 200 mph barrier that separates supercars from mere mortals, but most of them feel more like the rocket-powered roller skates if they actually do so.  From all accounts, however, the Veyron is different.  It feels more like a Bullet Train.  Gliding on electromagnets, and riding like it's on rails, nary a care in the world.  And that's the difference between carving a wedge out of carbon fibre and strapping 1000 horse power to it, keeping it running just long enough to technically claim the top speed world record for a day, and engineering the most impressive car to ever set a rubber foot on this planet.



Honourable Mentions:
2005 Ferrari F430 Spider
2005 Saleen S7 Twin Turbo
2005 TVR Sagaris

Friday, April 8, 2011

Top 10 Favourite Cars (1990-1999)

The parallels between cars and music throughout history is actually eerily similar.  Prior to the late 1800's there was no way to record and reproduce music, just like there was no means of personal transportation that didn't feature a horse.  The advent of the phonograph and vinyl records (1877) coincides pretty closely with Karl Benz's invention of the Motorwagen (1885); radio broadcasting technology (1919) lines up pretty closely with Henry Ford's revolutionary assembly line production (1914) in bringing both technologies to the masses; and along the way things like Beatlemania (1964-1970) lining up with the muscle car era (1964-1973) and the questionable stuff made from both industries in the 1980's further makes me think that the two are much more closely linked than just simply most cars coming equipped with a stereo.

In keeping with the analogy, I feel the nineties also mirrored the similarities of the two seemingly different industries.  Coming out of the abysmal eighties, the music industry was dominated by a lot of terrible trends: MC Hammer, Vanilla Ice, Kris Kross, hair metal bands, etc... and the automotive industry wasn't much better.  But just like Grunge came along and saved music, so too did the Supercars.



1993 Mazda RX-7
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 1.3 L Rotary
Horsepower: 261 bhp
Torque: 217 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2830 lbs
Top Speed: 155 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.9 seconds


The RX-7 is a pretty infamous car.  Great styling, legendary engine, highly sought after, even to this day.  It's all very good stuff.  But rather than sing it's praises, I instead feel the need to discuss the MX-5.  That's right, the Miata.  It made my honourable mentions, but those cars simply get listed, and since the Miata has the stigma of being a lady's sports car, I feel that I should justify it's selection, and I can't think of where else to do it than right here, in the entry for it's fellow Mazda brethren.

It's not much of a performer, and it's not much to look at (although it's much better looking nowadays than it was back in the nineties), but the Miata is an important car.  It single-handedly revived the roadster as a viable car for production, and without it, we probably would never have seen such great cars as the Honda S2000, the Mercedes SLK, or the Porsche Boxster.  But you don't have to take my word for it, as usual, Jeremy Clarkson has already said it best:

The fact is that if you want a sports car, the MX-5 is perfect. Nothing on the road will give you better value. Nothing will give you so much fun. The only reason I’m giving it five stars is because I can’t give it 14."
- The Sunday Times, London (August 16, 2009)



1997 Chevrolet Corvette
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.7 L V8
Horsepower: 345 bhp
Torque: 350 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3230 lbs
Top Speed: 172 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.8 seconds


Although the 4th generation (aka: the eighties) Corvette was a step in the right direction in terms of philosophy - returning to a true sports car platform, as opposed to their ill-fated attempts at a softer grand touring car during the late stages of the third generation - it was still never a very good car (especially now that history has been given enough time to properly judge it).  That makes this, the debut of the 5th generation, all the more pleasing by comparison.  They took the solid ideas from the 4th generation and finally wrapped a good-looking body around it.  As you know, I grew up loving Corvettes, and after abandoning nearly all hope in the nineties, this is the car that won me back.



1997 Acura NSX
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.2 L V6
Horsepower: 290 bhp
Torque: 224 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3160 lbs
Top Speed: 168 mph
Zero to Sixty: 5.1 seconds


When you think of high performance cars, Honda isn't a name that comes to mind very often.  But considering their success in Formula One racing, as well as being the sole engine provider for Indy Car, they really should be.  Maybe they simply don't care.  They know they make great engines, and they don't need a sports car in their line up to prove it (their closest current model that could even be considered a performance coupe is the V6 Accord).  And that's a shame.  Because the NSX was a heck of a car, and a nice little platform for Honda to strut their stuff with.  Unfortunately, they discontinued it back in 2005.



1999 Ferrari 360 Modena
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.6 L V8
Horsepower: 395 bhp
Torque: 275 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3064 lbs
Top Speed: 189 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.3 seconds


You might think that this selection is a little biased, seeing as this is the only Ferrari that I've ever actually driven.  And, while it's true that this has earned it a soft spot in my heart for the rest of time, at the end of the day, it's still a great car.  Not quite as good looking as the F355 (see: #5) that it replaced, or the F430 that replaced it, but the 360 is still pretty easy on the eyes, and not-too-shabby in the performance department either.



1996 Dodge Viper GTS
Layout: Front Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 8.0 L V10
Horsepower: 450 bhp
Torque: 490 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3360 lbs
Top Speed: 185 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.6 seconds


The Viper was conceived as an homage to the legendary Cobra of the sixties.  And while it doesn't even come close in my mind, it's still about as good of a modern interpretation that could possibly be done.  Especially since Carroll Shelby had a big hand in the car's initial design.  The Viper has become known for it's difficulty to drive, seeing that the big V10 isn't reigned in by any driver's aids, such as traction control or even ABS (although they eventually relented on that one).  This meant that any mistake by the driver would not be hidden by technology, and the only thing that controlled how fast the wheels spun, regardless of grip or safety, was how hard the driver pressed down on the gas pedal.



1995 Ferrari F355 Spider
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.5 L V8
Horsepower: 380 bhp
Torque: 268 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2976 lbs
Top Speed: 175 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.7 seconds


The nineties weren't a dominant time for Ferrari, unlike pretty much every other decade that has been covered by these lists.  With the rest of the field stepping up their game, Ferrari just wasn't as obviously head-and-shoulders above the competition anymore, and the Prancing Horse fell a bit by the wayside.  But only on paper.  In reality, they were still making some of the best cars on the road, even if they weren't as flashy as the Lamborghinis or as technologically astounding as the new breed of supercars*.

*Yes, I know, the F50 was a supercar that could hang with the best of them, but I was never really a fan.




1999 Lamborghini Diablo VT
Layout: Mid Engine, All Wheel Drive
Engine: 5.7 L V12
Horsepower: 523 bhp
Torque: 446 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3583 lbs
Top Speed: 207 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.95 seconds


The Diablo had some big shoes to fill.  The Countach was so over-the-top, and was immortalized on so many posters in so many bedrooms, that it was nearly impossible to be outdone.  The Diablo is obviously still very over-the-top, but the Countach had desensitized so many people to crazy design elements, that on looks alone, the Diablo couldn't possibly make as big a splash as it's predecessor.  As such, the minds in Italy needed to bring more than just good looks to the table, and set about fixing some of the old Lambo's glaring flaws.  Most notably, was a huge upgrade in driveability.   Whereas the Countach was a nightmare to spend more than 20 minutes in, the Diablo was actually a good car, both in terms of comfort (relatively speaking) and performance.  Easily breaking the 200 mph barrier and claiming the title of world's fastest production car at the time of it's release, the Diablo endured an 11 year production run, that saw the struggling company change hands between different owners four times.



1995 Porsche 911 Turbo
Layout: Rear Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.6 L Flat-6
Horsepower: 355 bhp
Torque: 384 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3276 lbs
Top Speed: 174 mph
Zero to Sixty: 4.5 seconds


The 911 has been around for a long, long time.  And although the typical joke is that it's hasn't changed much over those years, the truth is that of course, it has.  Sure, they refuse to give up on the rear engine placement that seems to hinder the car's handling much more than it helps anything else.  And although they've managed to engineer around this apparent flaw, to produce one of the finest cars on the road today, my favourite iteration of the 911 is still probably the 993 that lasted from 1993-1998.  Ya, they hadn't sorted out the handling yet, and ya, they were still using an air-cooled engine, but there's just something about this generation of 911 that does it for me.



1992 Jaguar XJ220
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 3.5 L V6
Horsepower: 542 bhp
Torque: 475 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 3025 lbs
Top Speed: 217 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.9 seconds


The Ferrari F40 had held the title as the world's fastest production car for a comfortable 4 years, starting in 1987.  Then suddenly the nineties hit, and every one and their dog wanted in on the action.  The Diablo started things off by cranking out 207 mph in 1991, only to be eclipsed by the Bugatti EB110 at 213 mph in 1992.  The Jaguar took over that same year, hitting 217 mph.  It was a crazy top-speed-arms-race, that ended with the brilliant McLaren F1 shortly thereafter.  But it's brief time spent at the top still remains the XJ220's main claim to fame, even though it was a pretty short-lived period of time that the car actually held the record.




1992 McLaren F1
Layout: Mid Engine, Rear Wheel Drive
Engine: 6.1 L V12
Horsepower: 627 bhp
Torque: 479 ft lbs
Curb Weight: 2513 lbs
Top Speed: 240 mph
Zero to Sixty: 3.2 seconds


Taking over from the Jaguar as the fastest car in the world, the McLaren held the honour for 13 impressive years.  But top speed isn't everything.  Sure it's a nice bullet point on the resume, but personally, I would still take the McLaren F1 over a Veyron any day of the week.  The Veyron is a marvel of modern engineering, sure, the numbers are mind-blowing, but it just isn't a driver's car like the McLaren is.  The Veyron looks like it might actually be comfortable to sit in.  And, while I'm sure that appeals to some folks, the point of a true supercar is obviously lost on them.  No radio, no turbochargers, seat smack-dab in the middle of the cockpit, just like a Formula One car?  Those are the makings of a true performance car.  If you can afford a supercar in this price range, then you buy a Maybach for the times you want to be comfortable, and you get a no-nonsense performance machine like the F1 when you want a thrill.



Honourable Mentions:
1996 Ferrari 550 Maranello
1993 TVR Griffith 500
1994 Mazda MX-5 Miata
1991 Bugatti EB110